Nazakit Ali
Prof. Mohammad Fariyad
Abstract:
In the modern era, social media has evolved as an effective mode of organization and mobilization for widespread public participation, especially among popular social justice groups in the modern world. In India, where socio, economic inequality based on caste, gender, class, religion, region and resource, access is rich and deep rooted, the relevance of social media becomes better understood as an alternate site of communication through which the marginalized are able to voice their grievances, share their realities, gain popular support and challenge existing socio, political inequalities.
In India, social networking sites, such as Facebook, Twitter (X), WhatsApp, YouTube and Instagram, have emerged as new spaces for the mobilization of popular debates on crucial social justice issues including caste discrimination, violence against women, the rights of farmers, tribals’ dispossession, minority rights and environmental justice. This paper seeks to explore how social media have facilitated in the emergence of organized social justice movements at the grass, roots level in India, by reducing the communication barriers and facilitating the swift flow of information.
Access through the internet and social media also reduces the barriers to participation by making it possible for ordinary people, activists and civil society organizations to mobilize collectively without the intermediary of the traditional media or political elites. As digital images, hashtags, viral videos, online campaigns and mobile live updates become tools for local protests to achieve national and international attention
This paper conclude that the social media helps and supports grassroots social justice movements. It is a good communication and learning medium, but real achievement can only be achieved by collective efforts and community participation, and sustained activity, not by social media campaigns alone.
Keywords: Social media, Social Justice, Digital Activism, Collective Action, Grassroots.
1. Introduction.
In Indian society and politics, social justice movements have played a long period of history since independence. Starting from the anti, caste movements to break the social hierarchy by the movement led by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Chipko Movement to safeguard the environment, Indian society has experienced a myriad forms of grassroots movements to combat domination (Omvedt, 1993). But, in the recent, digital technology and social media technology are emerging as new platforms to facilitate social justice movements. Social media websites have emerged as main sites of political activism in India. According to the Internet and Mobile Association of India, by 2023, the internet will have been used by more than 692 million Indians, resulting in the placement of India in the world ‘s largest online forum (IAMAI, 2023). This huge online sphere has offered new space for social justice organizations and activists to promote their causes, rally support and clash with the narratives. Social media’s importance to social justice movement lies in its ability to democratize how information flows. Compared to the media, which is traditionally monopolized by larger forces, social media allows users, activists and minority groups control over the messages they want to broadcast (Castells, 2012). This has been particularly important in the Indian context where the mainstream media has consistently misrepresented and failed to understand the issues faced by the minority groups. This paper aims to investigate the role of social media as a catalyst and a sustain of grassroots social justice movements in India. It seeks to examine how digital media has helped India, based activists and marginalized groups to gain a larger reach, mobilize supporters and attract international attention to their causes. In addition, the paper will also recognize the constraints of online activism, acknowledge its contribution to community building and on the ground mobilization.
2. Research Objectives
The primary objectives of this research are:
- To examine how social media platforms have facilitated the organisation and mobilization of grassroots social justice movements in India.
- To analyze the specific mechanisms through which social media reduces communication barriers and enables rapid information dissemination among activists and supporters.
- To investigate how marginalised communities in India use social media to voice their grievances, share their lived experiences and challenges existing socio- political inequalities.
- To examined and identify the specific case studies on social justice movements in India that have effectively utilized social media for advocacy and mobilization.
- To investigate and outline the strengths and limitations of social media as a tool for grassroots activism and social change.
3. Research Methodology.
This paper adopts the qualitative research methodology utilizing secondary data analysis. It references to existing academic literature, research reports, newspapers, case studies and data from credible organizations working on digital activism and social justice in India.
3.1 Analytical Framework.
Content analysis was used to analyze the use of social media in social justice movements. The content was analyzed for patterns of digital mobilization, communication strategies, and the relationship between social media and offline activism. The use of a critical analysis was also utilized to assess the opportunities for social change and the limits of social media.
4. Literature Review.
4.1 Social Media and Social Movements
Scholars have considered the relationship of the digital and social movement formation around the world. Manuel Castells (2012) wrote in his first book on social movements, “Networks of Outrage and Hope,” demonstrates that social media have led to new types of social movements, characterized by networked forms of organization, horizontal modes of interaction and the occupation of online and offline spaces. Castells describes new social movements as apolitical phenomena which are prompted violently and grow virally and leaderless. Clay Shirky (2011) highlights that social media tools provide the means for collective action by greatly reducing the costs of participation via communication and organizing efforts. His work “The Political Power of Social Media” demonstrates that these new media platforms offer new ways for people to organize and activate movements without the use of traditional hierarchical structures. However, he warns against technological ‘solutions’ and stresses a need for the human agency behind the technology to bring about social change.
4.2 Social Media and Activism in India
In the Indian context, researchers have explored the interplay of technology with the existing political, social and cultural fabric of the country. Karandikar and Kapoor (2018) argue that social media has brought previously disadvantaged groups, such as Dalit groups and women, new space for political agency. They observe how these groups have utilized mainstream platforms like Facebook and Twitter to reframe dominant narratives and organize networks for mobilization. Pal et al. (2016) conducted a comprehensive study of Twitter activism in India and observed there being new forms of a digital politics that grew largely among urban India youth. But they point to stark inequalities of access and participation led by language and class divides. English domination of most social media sites severely limits the scope for vernacular political action.
Ray and Katzenstein (2005) wrote in their book about social movements in India that, to understand social movements, we have to understand the social and historical circumstances in which they arise. The writers argue, that political institutions, social hierarchies and balances of power affect social movements. New communication technologies can ease the process of organizing a movement or communicating its message, but they are in themselves no guarantee for success. In the authors’ opinion a successful social movement has to form alliances and target powerful institutions.
4.3 Digital Divide and Inclusion
Another concern to keep in mind to analyze social media activism in India is the digital divide. In rural India, internet penetration is correspondingly much lower with only 37 per cent of the rural population even having access to the internet in comparison to 65 per cent urban internet penetration, as said by IAMAI (2023). This does indeed pose serious questions on the access perspective of social media activism. Scholars like Gurumurthy and Chami (2014) have identified the multiple overlapping layers of digital exclusion that exist along the lines of gender, caste and class in India. Further marginalisation exists for women, and especially women belonging to based and marginalised castes, in terms of access to the internet and digital literacy. This means that in the Indian context, social media might have a democratizing effect but it also risks reproducing existing inequalities.
5. Social Media Landscape in India
Table 5.1: Internet and Social Media Penetration in India (2023)
| Indicator | Urban Areas | Rural Areas | Overall, India |
| Internet Users (millions) | 437 | 255 | 692 |
| Internet Penetration Rate | 65% | 37% | 52% |
| Smartphone Users (millions) | 398 | 189 | 587 |
| Social Media Users (millions) | 352 | 115 | 467 |
| Average Daily Internet Usage | 4.8 hours | 3.2 hours | 4.1 hours |
Source: Internet And Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), 2023 Table 1.1
5.2 Internet and Social Media Penetration Table 1.1 Explanation.
India digital space has seen a tremendous transformation over the last decade. As per the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI, 2023), the country crossed 692 million internet users in 2023, which makes it the world second largest online market after China. The availability of cheap smartphones & low, cost mobile data after entry of Reliance Jio in 2016 had been the biggest contributors to this digital revolution. Indian social media websites have grown exponentially. As per Statista (2023), India is the largest country market for Facebook with over 450 million users. Other social media websites like WhatsApp & YouTube have more than 487 million users in India & 467 million in India respectively. While Twitter users are comparatively lesser with over 24 million users but it is instrumental in shaping political debate and public opinion in the country (Statista 2023).
5.3: Social Media Platform Users in India (2023)
| Platform | Users (millions) | Primary Age Group | Main Usage |
| 487 | 18-54 years | Messaging, Group Communication | |
| 450 | 25-44 years | Social Networking, Community Building | |
| YouTube | 467 | 18-34 years | Video Content, Entertainment, Education |
| 362 | 18-34 years | Visual Content, Stories, Reels | |
| Twitter (X) | 24 | 25-44 years | News, Political Discourse, Trending Topics |
| Telegram | 68 | 18-44 years | Messaging, Channel Broadcasting |
| 101 | 25-54 years | Professional Networking |
Source: Statista, Internet And Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), 2023 Table 1.2
5.2 Demographics of Social Media Users and Table 1.2 Explanation.
The data on social media use in India shows certain distinct trends. As per data, young people are widely using social media as compared to older people; that is 71 percent of people aged 18, 29 use social media as opposed to 31 percent of people aged 50 years and above (Pew Research Center, 2019). It also indicates that urban residents use social media more than villagers. But this gap is gradually closing as rural access increases. Language has also been an important factor in the way social media has developed in India. While the dominance of English persists on Twitter, linguistic content has been on the rise in vernacular languages, especially on Facebook, WhatsApp and YouTube. This has implications for the extent to which social media activism can be democratised.
6. Case Studies of Social Media in Grassroots Social Justice Movements
6.1 Anti-Rape Protests and #NirbhayaCase (2012)
In December 2012 the brutal gang rape and killing of a young woman in Delhi became known as the Nirbhaya case, and ignited protests across the country. It was also a defining moment for social media activism in India, with social media having played a factor in mobilizing protesters, co, ordinating demonstrations and maintaining the issues visibility in the media (Sharma, 2013). The hashtag #DelhiGangRape and #Nirbhaya was trending at the national as well as global levels, indicating the amount of Asia focused media attention on sexual violence in India. Activists disseminated information about protest sites through social media and posted images documenting police violence, countering the framing of the mainstream media. Facebook pages and WhatsApp groups were significant in mobilization and organization (Khanduri, 2014).
The movement showed the power of social media that could bring voices of activists and ordinary citizens to the broader arena to challenge traditional gatekeepers of information. However, it also showed the limitations of online activism. Social media was able to mobilize mass support to bring people to the street and galvanize national outrage, but the hard work of defining the legislation, working with politicians and institutionalising change often required conventional forms of advocacy work (Roy, 2014).
6.2 Dalit Rights Movements and #DalitLivesMatter
Dalit groups in India have now utilized social media platforms to record caste, based discrimination and violence, deconstruct Brahminical discourses and foster solidarities. The hashtag #DalitLivesMatter, coined based on the success of the Black Lives Matter movement, began trending worldwide after the suicide of Rohith Vemula, a Dalit research scholar at the University of Hyderabad in 2016 (Thirani, 2017). Social media gave Dalit activists a space to express their lived experiences of caste oppression that the mainstream media often suppress or distort. For example, through social media, Dalit intellectuals, writers and activists could construct alternative accounts and counter the notion of caste supremacy (Karandikar & Kapoor, 2018). The mobilization and documentation of which were key to the 2018 Bhima Koregaon protests, a celebration of a historic battle essential to Dalit identity also involved the large-scale use of social media. In the event of the violence that occurred during the celebration, social media was used to send live updates, record police action and local and national protests of solidarity (Teltumbde, 2018).
6.3 Farmers’ Protests (2020-2021)
Farmers’ protests against three Indian government passed agricultural laws in 2020 have been among the largest and most enduring social movements in the contemporary history of India. Throughout the year, long protests, during which hundreds of thousands of farmers, mostly from Punjab and Haryana, camped at Delhi borders, social media was playing a significant role (Singh, 2021). So, Twitter has emerged as an important arena for narrative control, with the hashtag #FarmersProtest rising to trending worldwide several times. Of course, when the Indian state ordered Twitter to suspend accounts of protesters the issue unleashed an international discussion on the right to free speech and digital rights (Mehta, 2021). The farmers and their supporters used social media to mobilize support, exchange information and challenged misinformation on various platforms. The role of WhatsApp groups was especially crucial to the mobilization at the ground level, the on, the, ground organization of the farmers’ protests, especially in the initial stages. The farmers used WhatsApp to organize their travel and mobilization to protest sites, exchanged information on essential supplies, and communicated across multiple locations and protest sites. Farmers’ and supporters’, You Tube channels provided live coverage and an alternative narrative to challenge the coverage by the mainstream media (Jodhka, 2021). The farmers’ movement revealed the limitations and difficulties of social media activism. Facebook and Twitter developed coordinated disinformation campaigns to discredit the farmers. Propagating fake news and divisive messages put pressures on activists to fact, check content and garner mass support (Bhattacharya, 2021).
6.4 Gender Justice and #MeToo Movement
The #MeToo movement, which became a global movement in 2017, gained huge momentum in India in 2018 when women took to social media to vocalize their experiences of molestation and sexual assault. It was here that the movement gained momentum in the industries of cinema, media, academics and law as women named their assailants and called for justice using tools like Twitter and Facebook (Chaudhuri, 2018).
In social media, survivors could get their stories out without the restrictions and constraints of the mass media. The viral nature of the movement was about a pronouncement, of a decisive and collective confrontation with issues of workplace harassment and violence against women. But the movement was also attacked, as being limited among English, speaking, city, based upper, caste women, with little to no engagement of working, class women and women from marginalized communities (Sharma, 2019).
7. How Social Media Facilitates Grassroots Movements
7.1 Reducing Communication Barriers
The rise of social media has revolutionised the nature of communication available to social justice campaigns by dramatically lowering the cost of the distribution of information. Historically activists could only reach people via meetings, printed material, face to face, or through supportive journalists. These modes were costly, slow, and limited in distribution (Shirky, 2011). Digital means have the ability of spreading the voice of activist organizations to thousands and millions of people with lower cost. It takes only seconds to transmit a tweet across the world; Facebook updates can be sent to people nationwide and a WhatsApp message can be forwarded to many groups all at the same time. This rapidity and capacity are essential in terms of protests and demonstrations, where the real time communication is an asset. (Tufekci, 2017).
7.2 Enabling Rapid Mobilization
Social networking sites facilitate quick mobilization of supporters for protests, rallies and other collective action. Hashtags act as magnet, helping individuals interested in a specific grievance locate each other and organize action. Facebook event pages and WhatsApp group messages can mobilize lakhs of protesters to demonstrations and sites of protest within hours (Bennett & Segerberg, 2013). The farmers’ protests are an example of this, where messages on social networking sites resulted in farmers arriving at Delhi borders from across the northern states. The anti, CAA protests of 2019, 2020 were similarly rapidly organized across cities, largely via social networking sites. (Gupta, 2020).
7.3 Providing Platforms for Marginalized Voices
One of the most crucial advantages of social media to be gained for social justice campaigns is its ability to provide a platform for the marginalized. Mainstream media in India has been accused of privileging the upper, caste, urban, centric vision of privileged male voices and neglecting or stereotyping the marginalized (Jeffrey & Doron, 2013). Social media has proved to be a very effective tool for Dalits, Adivasis, women, religious minorities and other marginalised groups to communicate experiences and opinions directly to larger audiences. This has been a crucial factor for the transgression of hegemonic narratives and the highlighting of issues that mainstream media often neglect to address (Karandikar & Kapoor, 2018).
7.4 Creating Alternative Media Ecosystems
Social media has allowed the formation of counter, media networks and alternatives to corporate, and state, controlled media. Dozens of citizen journalists, activist groups and independent media organizations have used YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and other online platforms to offer an alternative to mainstream news stories on social justice (Sreekumar, 2017). These sources of information were vital in the context of a lack of coverage or partisan coverage, as was seen throughout the farmer’s protest, You Tube channels run by farmers and their allies provided candid commentary and live coverage very different to that offered by many television stations (Singh, 2021).
7.5 Facilitating Documentation and Evidence Collection
Social media has been an indispensable source of reporting of human right abuses, police brutality and abuses of any form. For example, activists on the ground could use cell phone cameras to record abuses which is then roared through on social media pages for advocacy and legal action (Gregory, 2015). This type of documentation was especially important in instances when the official record of events didn’t match up with experiences on the ground. For instance, during the anti, CAA protests, pictures of the police brutalising protestors against the government were circulated online to refute the official story of the incident and get them to answer for their crimes (Gupta, 2020).
7.6 Building Transnational Solidarity Networks
Platforms such as social media allow local movements to build links with national and international movements of solidarity as a way of promoting their issues globally. Directed hashtag campaigns (on the scale of the Egyptian revolution) online petitions and online statements of support from international campaigns/activists and organizations has the potential to exert pressure upon governments and institutions (Juris, 2012). The protests received enormous international support, with celebrities, activists and organizations across the world voicing their support for the farmers on social media platforms. This added reputational pressure to the government of India and is said to have aided in the continuation of the protests that stretched to a year (Mehta, 2021).
8. Challenges and Limitations
8.1 Digital Divide and Exclusion
Even with the growth in internet penetration the country still faces large digital divides based on regions, class, caste, gender and language. Internet access remains limited in rural regions, especially in states like Bihar, in tribal zones (IAMAI, 2023). Therefore, rural voices are often missing in social media campaigns. Furthermore, access to social media by women is highly deterred by patriarchal systems and traditions. As per the Pew Research Center (2019), only 24% of Indian women are on social media as opposed to 42% of men. This gender divide limits the participation of women in digital activism as well as the issues they bring up.
8.2 Misinformation and Disinformation
Social media sites are also a source of the spread of mis, and dis, information; false information which can hinder social justice movements. For example, disinformation spreads even faster than the truth while being transmitted through WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter. Farmers protests have been targeted through coordinated disinformation campaigns that have branded them as terrorists, foreign agents and secessionists. These have been reproduced at scale by bot networks and partisanship social media accounts thus creating a landscape of confusion and division (Bhattacharya, 2021). Fielding hostilities on social media has also been used as a technique to foment communal hatred and violence against minorities in India (Arun, 2019).
8.3 Surveillance and Repression
Social media is also exploited by Governments and leading actors as a tool of surveillance to intimidate and suppress activists. In India, authorities have detained activists for their social media content, filed sedition charges and other related punishment for their posts and harassment of activists. (Human Rights Watch, 2021) The deployment of facial recognition technology to monitor protesters, the tracking of social media messages and the criminalization of online speech have all had a deterrent impact on online activism. A lot of activists have adopted digital security measures or self, censor their content to avoid persecution (Reporters Without Borders, 2022).
8.4 Platform Biases and Algorithmic Issues
Social media is not a neutral space or forum. It is run by corporations and algorithms unlikely to be sympathetic to social justice activist campaigns. Social media algorithms designed to keep us hooked on content by increasing our engagement prefer more provocative headlines to nuanced analysis (Tufekci, 2018). Moderation on platforms also can hinder activists, images or footage of a violation of human rights can be taken down for “violating community standards”, yet hate speech or disinformation persists. There have been times when social media corporations have gone along with requests by governments to take down content critical of authorities (Mehta, 2021).
9. Findings and Discussion: From the review of literature, data and case studies, this research draws out several important findings about the use of social media for grassroots social justice activism in India:
- Democratization of Communication: The use of social media for collective action allows common people, activists and marginalized groups to make their voice heard in new ways that are disconnected from traditional media hierarchies. This is significant in the Indian situation, where mainstream media often ignores or misrepresents minority groups and marginalized classes.
- Rapid Mobility: Digital platforms help movements mobilize support for protests and sit, ins nearly instantaneously. Hashtags, Facebook groups and WhatsApp messages mobilize thousands of people at the instant of a click, saving money and time for organizations.
- Voice of minorities: social media is used as a platform by minorities, Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims and women, giving them a space to speak out and articulate a different argument from dominant or mainstream discourses.
- Documentation and Accountability: Recording of violence, caste riots and other injustices on cell, phone cameras and their quick presentation through social networking sites have increased the possibility of social accountability. Visual evidence through photos and videos make the scope for police or state accountability more feasible.
- Transnational Solidarity: Social media links community, based groups with national movements, transnational networks, increasing the scope for material support, political influence and moral support.
- Persistence digital divides: In spite of these advantages, digital divides across geographies, class, caste, community, language and gender reduce the scope of social, media, based activism for the majority of marginalized and rural populations.
- Challenges of Misinformation: Exaggeration and misinformation through a social media platform is another negative factor affecting the credibility of social justice movements on social media.
- State Surveillance and repression: The use of social media as a means of repression and monitoring by governments is another limiting factor. It thus discourages social activism on the digital platform.
10. Conclusion
This paper explores the use of social media in empowering grassroots social justice movements in India. It demonstrates how electronic media has emerged as an important space for consciousness raising, energizing collective action and providing a 21st century voice to the marginalized sections. Protest movements like the 2012 anti, rape protests, Dalit movements, farmers protest (2020, 2021), environment movements and the 2017 #MeToo campaign clearly show how with the help of information and communication technologies, activists sought the attention of wider public by ways of hashtags, videos and campaigns. Indeed, the report also focuses on the “digital divide” false information, the use of monitoring and the superficiality of online activism. It underlines that social media in itself cannot be the permanent tool of change. Effective social change can only be obtained through a solid link between on and off line involvement, long, term local activism and institutions.
References
Arun, C. (2019). On WhatsApp, rumours, and lynchings. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(6), 30-35.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
Bhattacharya, A. (2021). Disinformation and the farmers’ protest in India. The Wire.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
Chaudhuri, M. (2018). #MeToo in India: What we know so far. The Hindu.
D’Monte, D. (2019). How Mumbai’s Aarey forest became a battleground. The Guardian.
Gabbatiss, J. (2019). Youth climate strikes: Students around the world join global protest. Independent.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Gregory, S. (2015). Cameras everywhere: Ubiquitous video documentation of human rights. The Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16(1), 76-85.
Gupta, S. (2020). Shaheen Bagh: A month-long women-led protest against citizenship law. The Indian Express.
Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Digital technologies and gender justice in India: An analysis of key policy and programming concerns. IT for Change.
Human Rights Watch. (2021). India: Events of 2020. Human Rights Watch.
Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI). (2023). Internet in India 2023 report. IAMAI.
Jeffrey, R., & Doron, A. (2013). The great Indian phone book: How the cheap cell phone changes business, politics, and daily life. Harvard University Press.
Jodhka, S. S. (2021). Understanding the farmers’ protest. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(5), 18-21.
Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259-279.
Karandikar, S., & Kapoor, H. (2018). Caste in the digital age: Dalit Internet activism in India. South Asia Research, 38(3), 324-339.
Khanduri, R. (2014). Vernacularising sexual violence: Notes on reading a public secret. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 48(3), 387-410.
Mehta, N. (2021). India’s farmers’ protest and the Twitter files. Al Jazeera.
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
Omvedt, G. (1993). Reinventing revolution: New social movements and the socialist tradition in India. M.E. Sharpe.
Padel, F., & Das, S. (2010). Out of this earth: East India Adivasis and the aluminium cartel. Orient BlackSwan.
Pal, J., Chandra, P., Vydiswaran, V. V., & Koenig, M. (2016). Twitter and the rebranding of Narendra Modi. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(8), 52-60.
Pew Research Center. (2019). Social media use in 2019. Pew Research Center.
Ray, R., & Katzenstein, M. F. (2005). Social movements in India: Poverty, power, and politics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Reporters Without Borders. (2022). India: World Press Freedom Index. Reporters Without Borders.
Roy, S. (2014). New women’s activism, class and social media in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39), 18-21.
Sharma, A. (2013). Using social media for disaster risk reduction: Lessons from India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 6, 35-42.
Sharma, S. (2019). Whose #MeToo? Gender, caste and class in India. Feminist Media Studies, 19(7), 1080-1085.
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28-41.
Singh, K. (2021). The farmer’s protest: How social media became a battleground. The Caravan.
Sreekumar, T. T. (2017). Mobile phones and the mediation of social space: The case of Kerala, India. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 51(2), 139-164.
Statista. (2023). Social media statistics India. Statista.
Teltumbde, A. (2018). Republic of caste: Thinking equality in the time of neoliberal Hindutva. Navayana.
Thirani, S. (2017). The afterlives of Rohith Vemula: Dalit politics, caste and everyday life in India. South Asian History and Culture, 8(4), 450-468.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2018). YouTube, the great radicalizer. The New York Times.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
